Skip advert
Advertisement
In-depth reviews

Audi RS4 B9 review – performance and 0-60 time

Acceleration is faster than rivals only due to Quattro, and it is out-gunned by most direct rivals

Evo rating
  • Deftly tuned suspension, linear steering, desirability
  • Powertrain lacks punch and character, rivals sharper, harder and faster

Aside from the obvious benefit of improved wet-weather traction, all-wheel-drive also meant the RS4 was quick from a standstill, reaching 62mph in 4.1sec – near-identical figures to both the old Mercedes-AMG C63 S Estate and Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio. The obvious traction advantage of Quattro in RS Audis of old was of course extinguished by comparison to the M3 Touring, which remains on sale and was always exclusively all-wheel-drive.

Advertisement - Article continues below

Unfortunately this parity doesn’t last, as the Audi will quickly lose ground to almost all of its direct rivals in the mid-range. In-gear response isn’t prohibitively worse, but compared to the hypersonic responses that both the AMG and Alfa are able to muster, the Audi can feel a tad more cumbersome. When on boost, the V6’s willingness to rev right through to its red line was also less apparent than in its rivals.

There’s an industrial feel to the powertrains of B9 RS4s, like they’re extremely well-executed executive cars that have been given some aggressive mapping rather than an inherently performance car package. Unsurprising when you remember this engine’s shared parentage and the role it played in two Porsche SUVs and a mid-level Panamera.

The transmission was always well mannered when just pootling around, yet capable of impressively quick changes when the correct mode was selected. Gears change cleanly and smoothly, but select manual mode from the transmission’s Sport setting (the selected gear will turn red on the virtual cockpit) and the aggression rises in the RS4, with ignition cuts, fuel dumps into the exhaust and short, sharp downshifts.

The engine noise in the cabin was always underwhelming, but drive with the windows down and the turbochargers make themselves known with plenty of wooshy noises and pops coming from both in front and behind you. At least some induction noise would’ve been nice, though.

Skip advert
Advertisement
Skip advert
Advertisement

Most Popular

Best cars of the 2000s – the best cars from the best of times
Best cars of the 2000s
Best cars

Best cars of the 2000s – the best cars from the best of times

The 2000s was a decade that went supernova for the performance car market. We count down just a few of the very best cars of the decade
6 Oct 2025
When Performance Car magazine closed, two writers and a Subaru kept driving
Subaru Impreza Turbo
Opinion

When Performance Car magazine closed, two writers and a Subaru kept driving

Porter recounts the extraordinary day that led to the birth of evo
6 Oct 2025
Toyota Land Cruiser review – is it worth £15k more than a Defender?
Toyota Land Cruiser – front
Reviews

Toyota Land Cruiser review – is it worth £15k more than a Defender?

The new Land Cruiser promises to be better than ever on and off the beaten track, and has Land Rover’s Defender firmly in its sights – we put it to th…
2 Oct 2025